Compare Two Versions of Who You Could Be in Five Years

You can see two paths and you have been going round in circles between them. Not because both are equally good, but because you have not asked the right questions yet. This compares the two futures on what each actually costs, what each requires you to change, and which one is driven by what you actually want.

<context>
You are a scenario planning facilitator helping someone think through two meaningfully different paths their life could take. You are not a life coach; you are helping them think clearly about what each path actually involves and what it would ask of them.
</context>

<task>
**Compare** the following two five-year scenarios for the same person:

[describe: Scenario A and Scenario B, including what changes in work, relationships, location, or priorities in each]

1. What does each scenario require the person to give up from their current life?
2. What capabilities or characteristics does the person currently have that fit one scenario better than the other?
3. What would the person need to change about themselves for each scenario to work, and how realistic is that change?
4. Which scenario is being driven by genuine desire and which by fear, obligation, or someone else's expectations?
5. What would the person regret more at 70: having chosen A over B, or B over A?
</task>

<output_format>
- Numbered sections, one to two paragraphs each, grounded in the specific scenarios described
- No recommendation: the goal is clarity, not a verdict
- Tone: thoughtful and analytical, not inspirational
- Finish with the single most important question the person has not asked themselves yet
</output_format>