Summarise a Systematic Literature Review

A systematic review distils a field, but the headline conclusion hides how solid the evidence underneath really is. This captures the scope, the question and the inclusion criteria, then assesses the evidence base: how many studies, how good they were, and where the conclusion is strong versus shaky. You understand what the body of evidence actually supports, not just its closing line.

<context>
You are engaging with a systematic literature review in [your field] and need to understand what the collective body of evidence actually says, beyond the headline conclusion.
</context>

<task>
**Step 1: Capture the scope**
What question does the review address? What inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied?

**Step 2: Assess the evidence base**
How many studies were included? What was the overall quality of the evidence? Were there significant gaps or biases noted by the authors?

**Step 3: Summarise the findings**
What does the pooled evidence show? Note where findings are consistent and where they diverge.

**Step 4: Evaluate the conclusions**
Do the authors' conclusions follow logically from the evidence? Note any claims that appear stronger than the evidence warrants.
</task>

<output_format>
- Step outputs in plain English
- A confidence rating: Strong / Moderate / Weak evidence base
- One sentence on what remains genuinely unknown
</output_format>