Decode a Conference Paper Abstract

You've got an abstract and a stack of others behind it, and you need to decide fast whether this one earns the full read. This pulls it into a decision-ready summary: the question the paper claims to answer, what the researchers actually did in plain terms, and the claimed contribution. You triage the reading list instead of opening every PDF on faith.

<context>
You are reviewing a conference paper abstract in [your research field] and need to decide quickly whether the paper is worth reading in full. You have only the abstract.
</context>

<task>
**Translate the abstract into a decision-ready summary:**
1. Research question: what question does this paper claim to answer?
2. Method in plain terms: what did the researchers actually do?
3. Claimed contribution: what do the authors claim is new or significant?
4. Plausibility check: based on the abstract alone, do the claims seem credible and the scope realistic?
5. Read or skip verdict: given your interests in [specific topic], should you read the full paper? Why or why not?
</task>

<output_format>
- Five short sections in plain English
- A one-line verdict at the end: Read / Skim / Skip, with a reason
</output_format>