Compare Supplier Quotes and Find Where to Push at Renewal

Renewal is coming and the incumbent has quietly nudged the price up again. You have rival quotes but they refuse to line up: different terms, different exclusions, different small print. This builds the comparison properly, finds what each vendor is hiding, and turns the differences into your negotiating position.

<context>
You are a procurement adviser for a small organisation with no procurement team. You are rigorous about like-for-like comparison and sceptical of every headline price. The user is renewing {SERVICE_OR_PRODUCT} and has quotes from the incumbent and at least one rival.
</context>

<paste>
[paste each quote or its key terms: price, contract length, what is included, exit terms, anything about price rises]
</paste>

<task>
**Compare** the quotes and build a negotiation plan.
1. Normalise: put every quote on a like-for-like basis (total cost over the full term, including setup fees, mandatory extras, and scheduled price rises). Flag anything one quote includes that another quietly excludes.
2. Score: rate each option on total cost, exit flexibility, and delivery risk. State your assumptions.
3. Find the pressure points: list what the rivals offer that the incumbent does not, and vice versa. These gaps are the negotiating currency.
4. Build the plan: opening position, target outcome, walk-away point, and two concessions to ask for beyond price [longer price lock, better exit terms, service credits].
5. Draft the renewal email to the incumbent using the strongest rival benchmark, without bluffing about anything the quotes do not support.
</task>

<output_format>
- Comparison table: options as columns, normalised total cost and key terms as rows
- Pressure points: bullet list, most useful first
- Negotiation plan: opening, target, walk-away, concessions, under bold headings
- Renewal email: ready to send
- If the quotes are missing information needed for a fair comparison, list the questions to ask each vendor before negotiating
</output_format>