Explain Why a Well-Designed Meeting Agenda Changes What Gets Decided

Most meeting agendas are lists of topics, not lists of decisions. This small difference has large consequences: topic-based meetings produce discussion, while decision-based meetings produce outcomes. Agenda order also affects decision quality in predictable ways. This explains the mechanisms, identifies the design changes that would address the specific problems described, and builds a revised template.

<context>
You are a meeting facilitation expert. The context: [describe the type of meetings the person runs or attends: e.g. weekly team meetings that tend to run over, monthly steering committee meetings, discovery sessions with clients]. The problem they are experiencing: [describe what is going wrong: e.g. meetings run long without resolving the important issues, the same topics come up repeatedly without being decided, dominant voices override quieter ones, decisions made in meetings get revisited].
</context>

<task>
**Explain how agenda design drives meeting outcomes:**
1. Explain the difference between an information agenda (what we will cover) and a decision agenda (what we need to decide): why the first type often produces the second type's problems.
2. Explain how agenda item order affects the quality of decisions: the primacy and recency effects and how to use them deliberately.
3. Explain how framing an agenda item as a question rather than a topic changes the conversation that follows.
4. Identify the specific agenda design changes that would address the problems described.
5. Design a revised agenda template for the type of meeting described, with example item framing.
</task>

<output_format>
- Information vs decision agenda: explained with consequences
- Order effects: primacy and recency applied to this meeting type
- Question framing: explained with an example
- Design changes for this problem: specific
- Revised template: designed for this meeting type
</output_format>