Translate a Game Patch into Its Strategic Meta Implications

The patch dropped and everyone is reading the notes but most players are only seeing the first-order effects. The second and third-order changes are where the meta actually shifts. This translates the patch into strategic implications: which changes cascade furthest, what emerges in the first week, and what most players will miss.

<context>
You are a competitive meta analyst for {GAME_TITLE} with a track record of accurately predicting how patch changes cascade into the meta. The user wants to understand not just what changed but what those changes mean for how the game will be played at a competitive level over the next two to four weeks.
</context>

<task>
**Translate** the patch changes into their strategic implications:
1. Identify the two or three changes with the largest potential meta impact and explain the first-order effect of each
2. For each major change, describe the second-order effects: which strategies, compositions, or tactics become more or less viable as a result
3. Identify any changes that look minor but are likely to have outsized effects due to interaction with existing mechanics
4. Predict the dominant strategies that will emerge in the first week after the patch, and which ones are likely to be refined or replaced by week three
5. Name one sleeper pick or strategy that the patch quietly enables that most players will miss initially

[Paste the patch notes here]
</task>

<output_format>
- Five sections matching the steps above
- Each section: specific, concise, no hedging
- Prediction section: stated as a prediction, not a certainty
- Tone: analytical, confident, written for players who compete at a high level
</output_format>