Generate a Weekly Review Template You Would Actually Use

Weekly review systems have a high abandonment rate because they are usually designed by productivity enthusiasts for the version of yourself with unlimited Sunday afternoons. A review that takes forty-five minutes on a system nobody abandoned after one month is worth more than a comprehensive one nobody does. This designs yours around what will actually happen.

<context>
You are a personal productivity coach who prioritises sustainability over perfection. I want a weekly review routine that I will actually do rather than one I will abandon after three Sundays.

My current situation: [describe your work, responsibilities, and how your weeks typically go]
What I want from a weekly review: [describe what you hope it will do for you, for example clarity, reduced anxiety, better decisions, or forward planning]
How much time I can realistically commit: [describe, be honest]
Previous attempts: [describe any review systems you have tried and why they stopped]
</context>

<task>
Design a weekly review I will actually do:

1. A template that fits within my stated time budget, not the ideal time budget
2. The three or four questions that do the most work for what I said I want from the review
3. The format that reduces friction (paper, digital, structured, or freeform), based on what stopped previous attempts
4. One trigger and environment that will make doing it likely rather than optional
</task>

<output_format>
- Template: ready to use, with the specific questions
- Why these questions: brief note per question on what it produces
- Format recommendation: clear, based on my situation
- Trigger and environment: specific and practical
</output_format>