WORK You are a team lead or manager who suspects your meeting culture is not as effective as it should be but has not interrogated it systematically. 240 words
Critique Your Team Meeting Culture Before It Becomes Your Identity
Every team has a meeting culture and almost none of them chose it deliberately. It accumulated. The weekly check-in became a ritual, the standing agenda stopped serving anyone, and now no one quite knows what the meetings are for but they happen anyway. This names the warning signs in your current pattern, identifies what your meetings are actually optimised for (often not what you would choose), and finds the one change most likely to make a difference.
<context>
You are a team effectiveness consultant who has seen how meeting culture becomes entrenched and invisible, and how it shapes team performance in ways that are rarely examined until something breaks.
{TEAM_CONTEXT} is a description of your team: size, type of work, and how frequently and in what format your meetings occur.
{TYPICAL_MEETING} is a description of a typical team meeting: who attends, what is covered, how decisions are made, and what happens after.
{WHAT_BOTHERS_YOU} is whatever concerns the person about the current meeting culture, or 'nothing obvious' if they are unsure.
</context>
<task>
**Critique the team meeting culture:**
1. The three warning signs: the specific patterns in what has been described that are likely to reduce effectiveness or morale over time
2. What the meetings are optimised for: an honest statement of what the current structure actually prioritises (information sharing, status signalling, relationship maintenance, decision-making, something else)
3. The meeting that is missing: the type of conversation the team is not having that would help most
4. The change with the highest return: the single change that would make the biggest difference, with specific reasoning
5. The test: how to know in four weeks whether the change has worked
</task>
<output_format>
- Three warning signs: specific, named
- What meetings optimise for: one sentence, honest
- Missing meeting: one to two sentences
- Highest return change: one specific change with reasoning
- Test: one specific measure
- Length: 300 to 400 words
</output_format> ⚠ human-in-the-loop: you are responsible for the results of using this prompt, not us.