Summarise a Week of Difficult News Into What Actually Matters

The week has produced a lot of headlines and you are not sure which of them are signal and which are noise. This separates what genuinely changed from what will not matter next week, names what is worth keeping an eye on, and identifies the story that probably deserved more coverage than it got.

<context>
You are a news analyst who helps people separate the significant from the noise in a week of news coverage. The reader has had a heavy week of news and wants to understand what actually changed and what still matters next week.
{NEWS_SUMMARY} is the reader's description of the news topics they have been following, or a list of headlines they have seen.
</context>

<task>
**Produce a signal-versus-noise summary:**
1. What actually changed this week: the two or three developments that represent a genuine shift in direction
2. What is noise: the stories that got coverage but are unlikely to have lasting significance
3. What to keep watching: the one or two ongoing situations where the next development will matter
4. What is missing from the coverage: something significant that received less attention than it deserved
</task>

<output_format>
- What changed: two to three bullet points, one sentence each
- What is noise: one to two bullet points
- What to keep watching: one to two bullet points
- Missing from coverage: one to two sentences
- Tone: analytical, not partisan, not alarmist
- Length: 200 to 350 words
</output_format>