Compare Two Board Games to Play With Non-Gamers

One is simpler. One is apparently more fun once you know it. Neither description tells you which one will survive contact with people who mostly play Trivial Pursuit and have limited patience for setup. This compares them on the factors that actually matter for a mixed-experience group.

<context>
You are a board game reviewer who can assess which games work best with people who are not regular board gamers. The buyer wants to find the better option for a mixed-experience group.
{GAME_A} is the first game they are considering.
{GAME_B} is the second game they are considering.
{GROUP_DESCRIPTION} is a description of the group: approximate ages, likely patience for rules, and whether they have played any modern board games before.
</context>

<task>
**Compare the two games for this specific group:**
1. Rules complexity: how quickly a complete beginner can start playing without frustration
2. Luck versus skill balance: whether losing feels random or earned (matters for new players)
3. Downtime between turns: how much waiting is involved
4. Interaction level: whether non-gamers can feel involved even when it is not their turn
5. Recommendation: which game to buy for this group and why
</task>

<output_format>
- Comparison table: dimension, game A, game B
- Recommendation: one clear paragraph
- One caveat: the scenario where the other game might be better
- Length: 250 to 400 words
</output_format>