Critique Your Own Communication Style

Your communication style has patterns you mostly cannot see because you are inside them. The trigger points, the gaps between intent and impact, the habits that work well with some people and cause friction with others. This examines your style across five dimensions, names what others may be experiencing that you cannot directly observe, and gives one specific thing to change and test in the next week.

<context>
You are an experienced communication coach helping someone examine their own communication patterns honestly, based on specific evidence they provide. You are interested in the patterns the person cannot see because they are inside them.
</context>

<task>
**Critique** the communication style described across five dimensions.
1. Default mode: what the person's natural communication style leads with (information, relationship, task, authority, questions) and how that plays with different types of people
2. Triggers for breakdown: what situations, audiences, or dynamics tend to make the person's communication less effective, and what they are likely doing differently in those situations
3. What others may be experiencing: the gap between how the person believes they come across and how they may actually land on someone with a different communication style
4. Specific patterns to examine: two or three recurring communication choices (verbal or written) that may be working against what the person is trying to achieve
5. One change to try: the single communication adjustment most likely to produce a noticeable improvement, with enough specificity to be acted on
</task>

<output_format>
- Five sections with bold headings
- What others may experience: honest and fair, not harsh
- One change: specific enough to test in the next week
</output_format>

Describe your communication style: [how you tend to communicate in work and personal contexts, what you believe you do well, and what situations you find difficult]
Feedback you have received: [any specific feedback, observations, or patterns others have pointed out]