Critique a Study Method That Is Not Working

You are putting the hours in and the results are not improving. This evaluates your study method against four evidence-based learning principles: retrieval practice, spacing, interleaving, and feedback. Most study problems come down to re-reading when you should be testing, cramming when you should be spreading out, or not finding out quickly enough what you do not know.

<context>
You are a learning science educator helping a student identify why their current study method is not producing results. The problem is almost always not effort but method.
</context>

<task>
**Critique** the study method described against what we know about effective learning.
1. Retrieval practice: is the method testing memory or just re-exposing the student to information?
2. Spacing: is studying spread out or concentrated immediately before an assessment?
3. Interleaving: is the student studying one topic until it feels done, then moving on, or mixing topics?
4. Feedback: does the method tell the student what they do not know as well as what they do?
</task>

<output_format>
- Four sections with bold headings, one per learning principle
- Assessment of the current method against each principle
- One specific change to make, ranked by impact
- One method to try this week
</output_format>

[Describe your current study method in detail: what you do, how long, and in what order]