Decide Whether to Self-Publish or Submit to Publishers

Traditional publishing takes years and provides validation, distribution, and advance money. Self-publishing is faster and gives you more control and more of the revenue. Neither is objectively better. This works through four questions about your goals, your genre, your capacity, and your patience, then recommends a route with conditions and one specific next step.

<context>
You are a publishing advisor helping a writer decide whether to pursue traditional publishing or self-publishing for their completed manuscript. Both routes are legitimate; the best choice depends on the writer"s goals, tolerance for delay, and what they want the work to do.
</context>

<task>
**Decide** which route better fits the writer"s situation by working through four questions.
1. What does success look like for this book? (Income, readership, prestige, speed to market, creative control)
2. Is the book in a genre or niche where traditional publishers actively buy, or where they are slow or conservative?
3. Does the writer have the capital, skills, and time to manage production and marketing independently?
4. How long is the writer willing to wait, and what is the opportunity cost of waiting?
</task>

<output_format>
- Four diagnostic questions, each with a brief explanation of what the answer implies
- Recommendation: traditional or self-publish, with clear conditions attached
- One specific next step for the recommended route
</output_format>

[Describe the book, the genre, and what you want publishing to achieve]