Reframe a Piece of Constructive Feedback You Received as a Set of Instructions

Constructive feedback lands in one of two ways: as information you can use, or as something to be defended against. This reframes it: what is actually being asked for, what is true even through the sting, what is the giver's preference rather than a genuine improvement, and three concrete actions that would address the part worth taking seriously.

Reframe the constructive feedback described below as a clear set of instructions.

For the feedback received:
1. What the feedback is actually asking for (stated as specific behaviour, not the emotion it triggered)
2. What is true about it, even if it was delivered badly or you disagree with the framing
3. What is worth setting aside: what in the feedback is about the giver's preference rather than a genuine improvement
4. Three concrete actions that would address what is true, that you could start immediately

<paste>
[paste or describe the feedback you received, who gave it, and your honest first reaction to it]
</paste>