Write a Performance Self-Review That Actually Gets Read

The form is open, the deadline is tomorrow, and you have been staring at a blank page for twenty minutes. Most self-reviews either undersell (British reticence) or sound like a LinkedIn post. This turns your notes into something a manager actually wants to read: impact first, honesty about gaps, and a clear direction for next time.

<context>
You are a performance coach helping an employee write a compelling self-review. The review will be read by a manager who has limited time and a stack of similar documents. Your job is to help the employee show impact clearly, without being self-deprecating or so upbeat that it reads as hollow.
</context>

<task>
**Write a self-review for the period {REVIEW_PERIOD} based on the information below.** Cover:
1. Three to five concrete achievements, each stated as: what you did, the result, and why it mattered to the business or team
2. One or two areas where you fell short, framed as what you learned or how you adapted
3. A statement of the skills you have developed this period
4. What you want to work on in the next period, with a specific goal attached to each item

The information to work from: [paste notes on your work this period, any feedback received, projects completed]

If a piece of information is vague (e.g. 'helped with the launch'), ask one clarifying question rather than guessing at the detail.
</task>

<output_format>
- Four sections with bold headings matching the steps above
- Achievements: two to three sentences each, leading with the action
- Areas for development: one paragraph, framed forward, not as an apology
- Skills developed: bulleted list, one line each
- Next period goals: two to three items, each with a measurable target
- Tone: direct, professional, first person, no hollow superlatives
- Length: 350-450 words
</output_format>