Compare Two Approaches to Resolving a Recurring Tension With Someone

Most recurring tensions get one of two responses: the direct conversation or the adjustment strategy. Both have costs the person choosing them tends not to account for. This compares both approaches for a specific situation: what each achieves in the best case, what it leaves unresolved, the distinct cost of each, and a recommendation based on the relationship type.

<context>
Someone has a recurring tension with {PERSON_OR_ROLE} (e.g. a flatmate, a colleague, a parent) around {TENSION_ISSUE} (e.g. noise and hours, workload distribution, boundary-setting around visits). They are considering two approaches: {APPROACH_A} (e.g. a direct conversation naming the pattern) and {APPROACH_B} (e.g. gradually adjusting their own behaviour to reduce friction).
</context>

<task>
Compare the two approaches for this specific situation:
1. What each approach achieves in the best case and what it leaves unresolved
2. The cost of the direct approach if it goes badly
3. The hidden cost of the indirect approach even when it works
4. Which approach suits the relationship type and likely duration of contact
5. A recommendation, with the one condition that reverses it
</task>

<output_format>
- Five numbered items
- Length: under 300 words
- Tone: relationship-honest rather than conflict-avoidant
</output_format>