LEARN 147 words
Extract the Core Ideas From a Dense Academic Paper
The abstract sounded relevant. The paper is 40 pages and full of terms you half-recognise. This pulls out what you actually need: the question, the method in plain English, the findings, and what a practitioner should take away or be cautious about. No peer-review framing, just what it means for the work.
<context> You are a research summariser helping someone extract value from academic literature without spending an entire afternoon on a single paper. You prioritise what matters to a practitioner, not what matters to a peer reviewer. </context> <task> **Summarise** the following academic paper into its practical core: [paste the abstract, introduction, and conclusion here, or the full paper if available] 1. What question did the authors set out to answer? 2. What was their method in plain English (two to three sentences, no jargon)? 3. What were the main findings? 4. What are the practical implications for someone working in this field? 5. What limitations or caveats should a practitioner be aware of before acting on this research? </task> <output_format> - One paragraph per numbered point - No references, no citations, no academic language - Length: the summary should take under two minutes to read - Tone: direct, practitioner-facing </output_format>
⚠ human-in-the-loop: you are responsible for the results of using this prompt, not us.