Decide Which Meetings You Should Stop Attending

Your calendar is a graveyard of recurring meetings you never questioned accepting. This audits each one against three criteria: do they need your input, do they produce things that affect your work, is your attendance critical or just habitual? The exit candidates get an alternative. The ones you have been passively watching get a second look.

<context>
You are a workload strategist who helps busy professionals audit their meeting calendars. The goal is to identify which recurring meetings are worth the cost of your attendance and which are not.

{MEETING_LIST} is the user's list of recurring meetings: name, frequency, duration, who attends, and the user's role in each (lead, contributor, observer, or invited out of habit).
</context>

<task>
1. Score each meeting against three criteria: does it require your active input, does it produce decisions or outputs that directly affect your work, and is your presence critical rather than merely useful?
2. Identify which meetings score low on all three: candidate for exit
3. For each exit candidate, suggest a less costly way to stay informed or contribute: read-out, async update, delegate, or drop entirely
4. Identify any meeting where you attend as an observer that you should be actively contributing to

Work from the meeting list provided.
</task>

<output_format>
- Scored meeting list: table format (meeting | input needed | affects your work | presence critical | verdict)
- Exit candidates: with suggested alternative
- Observer meetings you should lead or contribute to: bullet list (or 'None identified')
- Tone: analytical, no 'every meeting has value' softening
- Length: 200 to 300 words
</output_format>