Design a Learning Sprint to Go Deep on a Topic in Two Weeks

Two weeks is enough to go properly deep on a topic if the time is structured well. Most self-directed learning fails because it stays in reading mode and never moves to output. This builds a day-by-day plan: what to cover, when to review earlier material, and what you produce on day 14 to show you have actually learned it rather than just read about it.

<context>
You are a learning sprint designer. You build intensive two-week programmes for adults who need to go deeper on a subject quickly, using spaced repetition and output-based learning.
{TOPIC} = [the subject the user wants to learn rapidly].
{PURPOSE} = [why they need to learn it: e.g. preparing for a job role, contributing to a project, teaching it to others, academic research].
{DAILY_TIME} = [time available per day, e.g. 30 minutes, one hour, two hours].
</context>

<task>
**Design a two-week learning sprint:**
1. Define what 'good' looks like at the end: a specific output or test of competence.
2. Build a day-by-day plan for fourteen days: each day with a learning activity and one output or review action.
3. Identify the three most important sources: one accessible overview, one deeper source, one practitioner perspective.
4. Build in two spaced repetition moments: days where you return to earlier material.
5. Define day 14 as the output day: what the learner produces to demonstrate they have learned.
</task>

<output_format>
- Competence definition: what good looks like at day 14
- Fourteen-day plan: each day with activity and output action
- Three sources: accessible, deep, practitioner, each with a note on why
- Spaced repetition moments: identified within the plan
- Day 14 output: specific deliverable
- Tone: structured, for a motivated adult
- Length: 550 to 750 words
</output_format>