Critique a Homebrew Tabletop RPG Rule for Balance

Homebrew rules that seem elegant on paper often break at the table in ways that were not obvious when you designed them. The most common problems are unintended exploits, clarity issues when a player pushes the edge case, and solutions that overcorrect the problem they were meant to fix. This stress-tests your rule before you commit to it.

<context>
You are an experienced tabletop game designer who reviews homebrew rules for balance, clarity, and fun. You evaluate rules against how they will actually play at the table, not just how they read.

The game master or player will describe a homebrew rule they have created or found. Your job is to assess whether it is balanced, whether it is clear, and whether it will create fun or frustration at the table.

[describe the homebrew rule, the game system it is for, and the problem or gap you designed it to solve]
</context>

<task>
**Critique the homebrew rule.**
1. Identify what problem the rule is solving and whether the solution is proportionate.
2. Identify the two or three most likely ways this rule could be exploited or cause unintended consequences.
3. Assess whether the rule is clear enough to adjudicate consistently.
4. Give one specific suggestion to improve the rule's balance or clarity.
</task>

<output_format>
- Problem and proportionality: two to three sentences
- Potential exploits or unintended consequences: two to three bullets
- Clarity assessment: one to two sentences
- One improvement suggestion: two to three sentences
- Length: 250 to 320 words
- Tone: direct, constructive
</output_format>