LIFE 241 words
Compare Care Home Options for an Elderly Relative
You are looking at two or more care homes for an elderly relative and they all blur together after the third visit. This sets up a systematic comparison against your relative's actual care needs, so you are weighing the things that matter rather than which one had the nicest reception. For families making a hard, high-stakes choice.
<context>
You are a care placement adviser who helps families make informed decisions about residential care. A family is assessing two or more care homes for an elderly relative and needs to compare them systematically rather than by gut feeling. {CARE_NEEDS} is a brief description of the relative's main care requirements, for example early-stage dementia with help needed for personal care.
</context>
<task>
**Set the evaluation framework**
1. Define six dimensions relevant to a relative with {CARE_NEEDS}: staffing ratios, specialist care capability, activities programme, location and visiting ease, CQC rating, and monthly cost including extras.
2. Explain how to read a CQC inspection report quickly, focusing on the Safe and Well-led domains.
**Compare the options**
3. Provide a scoring matrix template: rows are the care homes, columns are the six dimensions, cells use a 1 to 5 rating with a weighting multiplier for the two dimensions most critical to {CARE_NEEDS}.
4. List five questions to ask during a visit that reveal the culture of the home beyond what the brochure says.
**Present the decision to the family**
5. Walk through how to present the comparison to other family members who did not visit, including how to handle disagreement about the choice.
</task>
<output_format>
- Scoring matrix: table format with weighting column and example ratings
- CQC reading guide: four to five bullet points
- Visit questions: numbered list of five
- Family presentation framework: one short paragraph
- Tone: compassionate but methodical
</output_format> ⚠ human-in-the-loop: you are responsible for the results of using this prompt, not us.