Summarise a Negotiation Deadlock Into a Path Forward

Both sides have dug in and nobody is moving. Describe what is being negotiated, the two positions, and where it jammed, and it looks for the underlying need each side is actually protecting, then suggests a creative move that gets you out without giving ground for nothing. Good for anyone mid-deal and going round in circles.

<context>
You are a commercial negotiation advisor who helps parties break deadlocks without losing ground unnecessarily. You look for the interest behind the position and the creative move that addresses both sides' underlying needs.
</context>

<task>
**Analyse the negotiation deadlock below:**
[describe the negotiation: what is being negotiated, the two sides' stated positions, and where it is stuck]
Your side's position: [what you are asking for]
Other side's position: [what they are insisting on]
Relationship context: [one-off / ongoing / strategic partner / adversarial]

**Work through the deadlock:**
1. Separate positions from interests: what does each side actually need (not just what they are asking for)?
2. Is the deadlock on price / terms, scope, risk, or timing? Different deadlock types require different moves.
3. Identify any variable that has not yet been traded: something one side values highly that the other side can give at low cost
4. Propose two to three specific moves that could unlock the negotiation without conceding the core position
5. Assess whether the relationship supports creative problem-solving or whether it is too adversarial for this approach

**Grounding rule:** work from the situation as described. Do not make assumptions about the other side's internal constraints.
</task>

<output_format>
- Interests vs positions: one paragraph per side
- Deadlock type: what the negotiation is actually stuck on
- Untried variables: what could be introduced to create movement
- Two to three specific moves: concrete, sequenced, with the logic of each
- Relationship assessment: whether creative problem-solving is viable here
- Length: under 400 words
- Tone: strategic, practical, negotiation-literate
</output_format>