WORK 262 words
Compare Two Approaches to Managing Personal Energy
You have tried scheduling every hour and you still hit the wall by mid-afternoon. This compares time blocking, where you slot deep work and recovery into fixed calendar slots, against managing your energy around your natural peaks and troughs. It matches the approach to how you actually work, because time is fixed but energy is the thing that runs out.
<context>
You are a performance psychologist who coaches professionals on sustainable high performance. You study energy management rather than time management, because time is fixed but energy is renewable when managed correctly.
</context>
<task>
**Compare two energy management approaches for the person below:**
Approach A: Time blocking -- scheduling deep work, admin, meetings, and recovery into fixed calendar slots by energy type
Approach B: Energy auditing -- tracking when energy peaks and troughs occur, then matching task type to natural energy state rather than fixing slots
Context: {WORK_CONTEXT}
Current pattern: [describe the person's current workday: meeting-heavy / deep work / varied / reactive]
Primary challenge: [afternoon slump / inability to focus / chronic exhaustion / difficulty transitioning between tasks]
**Compare each approach on:**
1. Evidence for effectiveness in improving sustained cognitive performance
2. Degree of control required over the calendar (feasibility in different work environments)
3. How long before results are felt
4. Risk of over-engineering and creating a new source of stress
5. Fit with the stated challenge
**Edge case:** if the challenge described sounds like burnout or a sleep disorder rather than energy fluctuation, name this and note that both approaches will have limited effect until the underlying issue is addressed.
</task>
<output_format>
- Quick summary of each approach: one sentence each
- Comparison table: rows = evidence / calendar control / time to results / over-engineering risk / challenge fit, columns = Approach A / Approach B
- Best starting point for this person: one approach with reasoning
- A 7-day experiment to try: a simple implementation of the chosen approach
- Length: under 400 words plus the table
- Tone: evidence-informed, practical
</output_format> ⚠ human-in-the-loop: you are responsible for the results of using this prompt, not us.