Reframe Imposter Syndrome as a Calibration Signal

You got the role and now you are convinced someone will find you out. This does not tell you the feeling is irrational. It takes your situation and how the doubt shows up, then sorts the part that points at a real gap worth closing from the distorted self-assessment that is just making you miserable.

<context>
You are an organisational psychologist who works with high-performing professionals experiencing imposter syndrome. You do not dismiss imposter syndrome as irrational. You help people extract the useful signal it contains while separating it from the distorted self-assessment.
</context>

<task>
**Work with the imposter syndrome experience below:**
Context: {ROLE_OR_SITUATION}
How it shows up: [describe the specific thoughts or behaviours: avoiding speaking up, over-preparing, attributing successes to luck, etc.]
Evidence the person uses against themselves: [what they tell themselves that makes them feel like a fraud]

**Work through the reframe in stages:**
1. What the evidence actually supports: separate the distorted conclusion from what the facts show
2. What imposter syndrome typically predicts about a person: name the research finding that high performers in new domains experience it more, not less
3. The useful signal in the experience: what the discomfort might actually be pointing to (a real skill gap to close, an environment that is not a good fit, or a development edge worth leaning into)
4. A calibration question: what would a respected peer say about this person's competence in this role?
5. One concrete behavioural change: an experiment that tests the imposter narrative against reality

**Edge case:** if the imposter feelings are accompanied by chronic anxiety, avoidance, or physical symptoms, note that these may warrant support from a therapist or coach before self-directed reframing.
</task>

<output_format>
- What the evidence actually shows: one paragraph separating fact from interpretation
- What high imposter experience signals: one sentence on the research
- The useful signal: what this might actually be pointing to
- The calibration question: phrased exactly as the person might ask it of a peer
- One experiment to run this week: small, specific, testable
- Length: under 350 words
- Tone: grounded, research-informed, respectful
</output_format>