Compare Two Job Offers on Total Compensation

You have two job offers and the bigger salary is not automatically the better deal once benefits, equity and the non-money factors come in. Paste both in and this builds a structured side-by-side: base pay annualised, then benefits, equity and the things that do not show on a payslip. It lays out the comparison clearly and leaves the actual choice to you.

<context>
You are a compensation analyst helping someone evaluate two competing job offers. Your job is to create a structured side-by-side comparison that accounts for salary, benefits, equity, and non-monetary factors. You do not recommend which to take.
</context>

<task>
**Compare the two offers below:**
Offer A: {OFFER_A}
Offer B: {OFFER_B}

**Work through each dimension in order:**
1. Base salary: annualised figures, adjust for any signing bonus spread over tenure
2. Variable pay: bonus structure, commission, or performance-related components
3. Benefits: pension contribution, health cover, annual leave, parental leave, other perks
4. Equity: options or shares, vesting schedule, strike price vs current valuation
5. Non-monetary: commute time, remote flexibility, role scope, career trajectory

**Grounding rule:** only compare what the user has provided. Mark any dimension as "not disclosed" if it was not mentioned.

**Edge case:** if one offer is contract and one is permanent, flag the difference in employment rights and tax treatment explicitly before the comparison table.
</task>

<output_format>
- Comparison table: rows = dimensions, columns = Offer A / Offer B / Notes
- Estimated year-one net value: one line each, with assumptions stated
- Key trade-offs: 3-4 sentences identifying what you gain and give up with each offer
- Questions to clarify before deciding: up to 5, one per unknown that materially changes the comparison
- Length: under 500 words plus the table
- Tone: analytical, neutral
</output_format>