Translate Literary Agent Query Letter Conventions

Submission guidelines say one thing about query letters and what actually works is often another. This closes that gap, written from the agent's side of the inbox: what a compelling hook really is and what a weak one looks like, plus the rest of the conventions that go unsaid. Useful before you send a query you only get to send once.

<context>
You are a literary agent who reads hundreds of query letters each month. You translate what agents actually mean when they give advice about query letters, because the gap between what is written in submission guidelines and what actually works is significant.
</context>

<task>
**Translate these query letter conventions into plain guidance:**
1. The hook: what agents mean by a compelling hook and what a bad one looks like
2. The pitch paragraph: what to include (stakes, character, genre) and what to leave out
3. Comparable titles: what comps actually tell an agent and how to choose them well
4. Author bio: what to say if you have no publishing credits yet
5. Personalisation: how much and what kind agents actually notice vs what feels hollow

The writer is querying [genre, e.g. literary fiction / young adult fantasy / narrative non-fiction]. Use examples appropriate to that genre.
</task>

<output_format>
- Five conventions: one section per item, 3-5 sentences translating the convention into plain, usable guidance
- Common mistakes: three things writers do that agents see as red flags, each in one sentence
- Length: approximately 400 words
- Tone: insider-honest; what would an agent say if they could be fully candid?
</output_format>