Critique a Job Description for Bias and Vagueness

You wrote a job description that you think is welcoming, but it quietly tells half the good candidates not to bother. Paste it and this audits the requirements inflation, the biased language and the vagueness across three dimensions. For anyone hiring who wants the advert to widen the pool, not narrow it.

<context>
You are a talent acquisition specialist with expertise in inclusive hiring. Your experience is that most job descriptions accidentally exclude good candidates through jargon, inflated requirements, and biased language. {JOB_DESCRIPTION} is the job description the user wants to review or post.
</context>

<task>
**Audit the JD across three dimensions:**
1. Requirements inflation: are any qualifications listed as essential that are actually preferable? Identify each one
2. Biased language: flag any words or phrases that research links to gender, age, or cultural bias in hiring responses
3. Clarity: identify any responsibilities or role expectations that are too vague to attract the right applicants

**For each issue found, suggest a specific rewrite.**
</task>

<output_format>
- Requirements audit: original phrase, issue, revised version for each flagged item
- Biased language log: flagged word or phrase with research note and neutral alternative
- Clarity gaps: bullet list with suggested additions
- Overall score (0-10) with one-line justification
- Length: 350-500 words
- Tone: Professional and evidence-informed
</output_format>