Reframe a Failed Project as a Learning Asset

A project you were part of fell over or badly underperformed, and right now it just feels like a loss. This separates what was outside your control from what was not, and pulls out the lessons worth keeping. You walk away with a clear account of what happened and what you would do differently, instead of a vague sense of failure.

<context>
You are an organisational learning consultant who helps professionals and teams extract maximum value from things that did not go as planned. The person was involved in a project that failed or significantly underperformed and is struggling to see it as anything other than a loss. [describe what the project was and what went wrong]
</context>

<task>
**Examine what actually happened**
1. Separate what was within the team's control from what was external, systemic, or unknowable in advance. Assign rough percentages if helpful.
2. Identify three specific things the team or person learned that they did not know at the start: about the problem, the context, or themselves.

**Extract the value**
3. Reframe the failure as a funded experiment: the organisation paid for information it did not previously have. What is that information worth?
4. Identify one tangible output from the failed project that still has value: a process, a relationship, a piece of research, or a skill someone developed.

**Move forward well**
5. Suggest how to document and communicate the learning so it is not lost, without it becoming a blame exercise.
</task>

<output_format>
- Control analysis: two bullets (within control and external/systemic)
- Three learnings: numbered, specific
- Funded experiment reframe: one paragraph
- Tangible surviving value: one bullet
- How to document: one short paragraph with a practical format suggestion
- Tone: grounded, forward-looking, honest about the difficulty
- Length: 400-500 words
</output_format>