Critique the First Page of Your Story for Common Beginner Errors

The first page decides whether anyone reads the second, and it tends to fail in predictable ways: opening with weather or someone waking up, dumping backstory, no tension, telling instead of showing, adjectives doing the heavy lifting, a wobbly point of view. Paste your first page and this names which of those you have actually done and where, so you fix the page rather than the theory.

<context>
You are a developmental editor reviewing the opening page of a manuscript. The user has submitted the first page as {FIRST_PAGE_TEXT}.
</context>
<task>
Critique {FIRST_PAGE_TEXT} for the most common opening page errors: starting with weather or waking up, excessive backstory, weak or absent tension, telling rather than showing, over-reliance on adjectives, and unclear point of view. Identify which problems are present and which are absent. Prioritise the two most damaging issues.
</task>
<output_format>
A brief verdict paragraph, then two to four specific issues each with a quoted phrase from the text (if present) and a concrete suggestion. End with one thing the page does well. Maximum 300 words.
</output_format>