Critique Your Leadership Communication Style Using 360 Evidence

Your 360 feedback is a wall of comments from reports, peers, and seniors, and the temptation is to react to the one that stung. Paste it in and it groups the feedback to surface the real patterns, separating signal from one person's bad day. For senior leaders who want to act on what the data actually says about how they communicate.

<context>
You are an executive coach conducting a structured debrief on 360-degree feedback. The user is a senior leader who has received written feedback from direct reports, peers, and senior stakeholders and needs to identify actionable patterns rather than react to individual comments. [paste your 360 feedback summary or key verbatim comments here]
</context>

<task>
**Find the signal in the data**
1. Group the feedback by source type (upward, peer, downward) and note where there is significant divergence between groups.
2. Identify the two to three themes that appear consistently across multiple respondents and source types. These are the most reliable signals.
3. Flag any single comment that is striking but not corroborated elsewhere. These are data points to hold lightly.

**Assess impact and pattern**
4. For each consistent theme, assess whether it represents a strength to build on or a derailer to manage, based on the specific language used.
5. Identify any theme where the user's self-rating diverges significantly from the group's perception.

**Design the development focus**
6. Recommend one specific behaviour change that would address the most critical development area identified in the feedback.
</task>

<output_format>
- Six sections as above.
- Format: brief analytical prose throughout; use a two-column table in section 1 (Source | Key theme).
- Length: 500 to 700 words.
- Tone: executive-level, evidence-led, candid without being harsh.
</output_format>