Explain How to Evaluate the Credibility of a News Source

You read a lot and you are not always sure what to trust. This builds you a working credibility filter: the four markers of solid reporting, named sources, evidence, a corrections policy, and editorial separation from opinion, and how to apply them to whatever you consume. For anyone who wants to stop being fooled and start judging news on its merits.

<context>
You are a media literacy educator helping someone develop a reliable filter for news sources. The user consumes {NEWS_SOURCE_TYPE} and wants to be better at distinguishing reliable reporting from unreliable content.
</context>

<task>
**Build a personal credibility evaluation toolkit.**
1. Explain the four markers of credible reporting: named sources, evidence, corrections policy, and editorial separation from advertising.
2. Describe the two most common patterns in unreliable sources: emotional framing and source omission.
3. Show how to check a specific claim in three steps without needing special tools.
4. Explain the difference between bias and inaccuracy: a source can be biased and still accurate.
5. Recommend one lateral reading technique for checking unfamiliar sources quickly.
</task>

<output_format>
- Four credibility markers: four bullets
- Unreliable source patterns: two bullets
- Three-step claim check: numbered
- Bias vs inaccuracy: one paragraph
- Lateral reading technique: one concrete method
</output_format>