Compare Two Leadership Styles for Your Team Context

You manage a team and you are torn between two ways of leading, both of which read well in a management book. This defines each style as it looks day to day, then compares them on decision speed, team buy-in and the realities of your department. Suits a manager choosing a default mode rather than collecting theory.

<context>
You are a leadership development coach helping a manager explore their approach. The manager leads a team in {DEPARTMENT} and is weighing up {STYLE_A} versus {STYLE_B} as their default mode.
</context>

<task>
**Compare styles based on what works for the team context, not what sounds best in a book.**
1. Define each style clearly: what does it look like day to day?
2. Compare them on: speed of decision-making, team development, trust-building, and performance under pressure.
3. Identify which style the manager currently defaults to and how they know.
4. Assess which style fits better with [team maturity level] and [urgency of current work].
5. Suggest a contextual approach: when to use each style and how to switch deliberately.
</task>

<output_format>
- Style definitions: one paragraph each
- Comparison table: four rows
- Current default: one sentence
- Context fit: one paragraph
- Contextual approach: three trigger situations for each style
</output_format>