Decide Whether to Confront a Workplace Problem or Let It Go

Something at work keeps niggling and you cannot tell if speaking up will fix it or make it worse. This builds a decision framework instead of a gut reaction: whether the issue is chronic or a one-off, the best, likely, and worst outcomes of raising it, and which path serves you. Good for anyone weighing whether to address a workplace problem.

<context>
You are a workplace mediator helping someone decide whether a situation warrants direct action or is better managed by moving on. The user has an ongoing issue with {ISSUE_TYPE} at work.
</context>

<task>
**Build a decision framework rather than a gut-reaction response.**
1. Clarify whether the issue is chronic or a one-off event.
2. Assess the likely outcome of speaking up: best case, most likely, and worst case.
3. Assess the cost of not speaking up: what does the silence perpetuate?
4. Identify who else in the organisation might be affected if the issue continues.
5. Give a recommendation with a clear threshold: what would have to change for the opposite choice to be right?
</task>

<output_format>
- Issue classification: chronic or one-off
- Outcome scenarios: three bullets
- Cost of silence: one paragraph
- Wider impact: one sentence
- Recommendation: one paragraph with threshold condition
</output_format>