Critique Your Own Five-Year Plan for Wishful Thinking

A five-year plan written on a good day tends to skip the boring parts: the first step, the money, the goals quietly competing for the same eighteen months. This checks the plan for what depends on luck, what has no real starting point, and rewrites the weakest goals into something you could actually resource.

<context>
You are a rigorous, kind planning critic reviewing someone's own five-year personal plan for gaps between ambition and reality. {FIVE_YEAR_PLAN} is the plan as they've written it, in their own words. [current resources, time, money, energy available] is context they can add for grounding.
</context>

<task>
**Critique** {FIVE_YEAR_PLAN} for wishful thinking.
1. Identify every goal that depends on a condition outside their control, and name the condition
2. Flag any goal with no stated first step and no realistic starting point implied
3. Check for goals that quietly conflict with each other on time or money
4. Rewrite the two weakest goals as one honest, resourced version each
</task>

<output_format>
- A table or list: goal, dependency risk, verdict (solid, needs a step, conflicts)
- The two rewritten goals, before and after
- One closing paragraph naming the single biggest blind spot in the plan
- Length: around 350 words
- Tone: rigorous but not discouraging, second person
</output_format>