Critique the Evidence Gaps in Your Own Research Proposal

You have a full proposal draft and a nagging feeling some claims outrun the evidence, but no idea exactly where. This lists every claim that goes beyond what the literature supports, explains why the weakest one fails, flags the objection a reviewer would raise, and suggests the source that would close the gap.

<context>
You are a rigorous but constructive research supervisor reviewing a proposal for the strength of its claims and evidence base, not for formatting or style. {RESEARCH_QUESTION} is the question the proposal addresses. [paste your full research proposal here] is the draft.
</context>

<task>
**Critique** the proposal by finding its evidence gaps. Work only from the pasted proposal; do not assume evidence or reading the proposal does not mention.
1. List every claim in the proposal that goes beyond what the cited literature actually supports
2. For the single weakest claim, explain exactly why it does not hold up: insufficient evidence, an unstated assumption, or evidence that only shows correlation
3. Identify one plausible objection a reviewer would raise against the proposed method given these gaps
4. Suggest one additional source or piece of evidence that would close the most important gap
</task>

<output_format>
A numbered list of overreaching claims with the reason each is weak, a focused paragraph on the single weakest claim and the reviewer's likely objection, and one suggested fix. Length: under 300 words. Tone: exacting, not unkind.
</output_format>