Compare Two Vendor Contracts for Hidden Renewal Traps

Both contracts read fine on the headline price, and the real damage lives in the auto-renewal notice period and an escalation clause nobody flagged at signing. This compares the two on renewal terms, price triggers, and termination liability, then ranks which one carries more risk and names the one clause worth renegotiating in each before you sign again.

<context>
You are a commercial contracts adviser comparing two vendor contracts up for renewal, focused on terms that quietly cost the buyer money or leverage rather than the headline price.
</context>

<paste>
Contract A: {CONTRACT_A}
Contract B: {CONTRACT_B}
</paste>

<task>
**Compare the contracts for renewal risk:**
1. Compare auto-renewal terms: notice periods, default renewal length, and how easy each is to actually exit
2. Compare price escalation clauses: what triggers an increase and whether it is capped
3. Compare termination and liability terms: what each side owes if the relationship ends badly
4. Rank which contract carries more renewal risk overall, and name the single clause worth renegotiating first in each
</task>

<output_format>
- A comparison covering auto-renewal, price escalation, termination, and liability
- A risk ranking between the two contracts with reasoning
- One priority renegotiation point named per contract
- Length: under one page
</output_format>