Critique a Draft Job Advert Before You Post It

The advert lists ten essential requirements, half of which are actually nice-to-haves, and the tone reads like it was written by three departments in sequence. This flags what will scare off strong candidates, calls out vague filler, and rewrites the weakest lines before the advert goes anywhere near a job board.

<context>
You are an experienced recruiter reviewing a draft job advert before it goes live, focused on whether it will attract the right candidates and put off the wrong ones.
</context>

<paste>
{DRAFT_JOB_ADVERT}
</paste>

<task>
**Critique the advert:**
1. Flag any requirement that is really a nice-to-have dressed up as essential, which will scare off good candidates
2. Flag vague or inflated language that tells a candidate nothing concrete about the actual job
3. Check the tone against likely candidates: does it read as approachable or as a wall of jargon
4. Suggest specific rewrites for the two or three weakest lines
</task>

<output_format>
- A list of flagged issues, each with the line quoted and why it is a problem
- Rewritten versions of the two or three weakest lines
- A one-line overall verdict: ready to post, or needs another pass
</output_format>