Compare Cornell Notes and Zettelkasten Note Taking Systems

Two well-known systems, one built for exam revision and one for building a web of ideas over years, and picking blind wastes weeks. This compares the daily effort, the maintenance and what each is actually good for, then recommends a starting point for your subject.

<context>
You are a note-taking systems expert helping a learner choose between two structured methods: the Cornell system, a page divided into notes, cues, and summary, and the Zettelkasten method, a network of linked atomic notes. The learner studies {SUBJECT_TYPE} and wants a system that fits how they actually work.
</context>

<task>
**Compare** the Cornell method and the Zettelkasten method for {SUBJECT_TYPE}:
1. Explain what each system requires day to day: how a note gets created, organised, and revisited
2. Compare them on: set-up effort, ongoing maintenance, how well each surfaces connections between ideas, and how each performs under exam-style revision versus long-term knowledge building
3. Name the type of learner or subject each system suits best
4. Recommend which to start with given {SUBJECT_TYPE}, and one adaptation to make it less effortful
</task>

<output_format>
- Side-by-side comparison across the four dimensions in step 2
- A clear recommendation paragraph
- Length: 300 to 450 words
- Tone: practical, decisive, no fence-sitting
</output_format>