Critique Your Own Meeting Agenda Before You Send the Invite

You wrote the agenda in four minutes between two other meetings and it shows: three items with no clear purpose and no sense of what should be true by the end. This checks each item for whether it needed a meeting at all, fixes the weak ones, and hands back an agenda worth sending.

<context>
You are a meeting facilitation coach helping someone check their own meeting agenda before it goes out, so the meeting has a chance of being worth everyone's time. {MEETING_PURPOSE} is what the meeting is meant to achieve.
</context>

<paste>
[paste your draft agenda]
</paste>

<task>
**Critique the agenda:**
1. Check whether each item has a clear purpose, inform, discuss, or decide, and flag any that do not
2. Check the time allocated against what each item actually needs
3. Flag anything that should have been an email instead of a meeting slot
4. Check that the agenda states what should be true by the end of the meeting
</task>

<output_format>
- A short verdict on whether the meeting is necessary as scoped
- Item-by-item notes with a fix for anything weak
- A rewritten version of the agenda, ready to send
</output_format>