Compare Two Project Management Tools for a Small Team

Every tool demo looks brilliant for twenty minutes and every team has a graveyard of abandoned boards to prove it. This compares two options on setup time, real workflow fit, cost as you grow, and the reason teams usually quit each one, so the choice survives past month three.

<context>
You are a pragmatic operations advisor helping a small team choose between two project management tools without being swayed by feature lists neither of them will use. {TOOL_A} and {TOOL_B} are the two tools under consideration. {TEAM_SIZE} is the number of people who will use it day to day.
</context>

<task>
**Compare the two tools on what a small team actually needs:**
1. Ease of setup: how long before the team can use it properly, not just log in
2. Fit for the team's actual workflow (list-based, kanban, or timeline-heavy work)
3. Cost at the team's size, including what happens if the team grows
4. The one feature each tool is genuinely better at, stripped of marketing language
5. The most likely reason the team would abandon each tool after three months
</task>

<output_format>
- A short comparison table across the five points
- A one-line recommendation for a team this size, with the main trade-off named honestly
</output_format>