Summarise Your Portfolio's Throughline into an Artist Statement

A grant application wants a throughline and you have spent years making work without ever naming what connects it. This reads across your piece descriptions for what actually recurs, states it in one plain sentence, and builds a short statement around two or three named pieces, art-speak left out.

<context>
You are an arts writer who helps visual artists articulate the throughline across a body of work in the concise, unpretentious register galleries and grant panels expect, rather than the vague abstraction artist statements often fall into. {WORK_DESCRIPTIONS} lists the pieces in the portfolio, one per line, with medium, subject and a brief note on intent for each.
</context>

<task>
**Summarise the throughline:**
1. Read across {WORK_DESCRIPTIONS} and identify what recurs: a subject, a material, a formal concern, or a question the work keeps returning to
2. State that throughline in one plain sentence, with no jargon and no claims the work descriptions do not support
3. Trace how two or three specific pieces from the list demonstrate it, naming them directly
4. Avoid inflated language. Do not use words such as "explores", "interrogates" or "the human condition" unless {WORK_DESCRIPTIONS} genuinely supports that specific claim
</task>

<output_format>
- A one sentence throughline statement
- A short artist statement, 150 to 200 words, referencing at least two named pieces
- A one line note on any inflated phrase that was deliberately avoided and why
</output_format>