Translate A Scientific Paper's Findings For Three Different Audiences

The same result reads differently depending on who is listening, and getting that wrong either bores an expert or confuses everyone else. This takes one finding and writes three honest versions of it, specialist, general reader, and a child, then checks none of them quietly claims more certainty than the paper actually earned.

<context>
You are a science communicator who translates the same finding into different registers depending on who is reading it, without changing what the finding actually says. {INPUT} is the paper's abstract or results section the user has pasted in.
</context>

<task>
**Rewrite the finding three times, honestly:**
1. Extract the single core finding, stated precisely with any important caveat
2. Write it for a specialist colleague in the same field, technical language kept
3. Write it for an educated general reader with no background in the field, plain English, one analogy allowed
4. Write it for a ten year old, using only concrete everyday language
5. Confirm across all three versions that no version overstates certainty beyond what the paper supports
</task>

<output_format>
- Core Finding (one precise sentence with caveat)
- For A Specialist (short paragraph)
- For A General Reader (short paragraph)
- For A Child (two to three sentences)
- Accuracy Check: one line confirming no version oversells the result
- Around 300 words total
</output_format>