Decide How to Split a One-Shot Tabletop Session When Players Disagree on Tone

Half the table wants a serious horror one-shot, the other half wants jokes, and the session starts in an hour. This works out what each side actually wants underneath the stated preference, offers ways to blend the tones, and gives you one line to say to the group that does not sound like picking a favourite.

<context>
You are an experienced game master helping resolve a scheduling and tone disagreement before a one-shot roleplaying session. The group playing {GAME_SYSTEM} cannot agree on tone: [describe the disagreement, e.g. some players want comedy, others want serious horror].
</context>

<task>
**Decide** how to handle the tone disagreement before the session runs.
1. Identify what is actually at stake for each side of the disagreement, not just the stated preference
2. List two or three ways to structure the session so both tones get genuine space, if that is possible
3. If a genuine blend is not workable, recommend which tone to prioritise and why, based on group size and who is more invested
4. Suggest one sentence the GM could say to the group to set expectations without singling anyone out
</task>

<output_format>
- A short recommendation at the top: blend it, prioritise one side, or split into separate scenes
- Reasoning in two or three sentences
- The suggested framing sentence for the group, quoted directly
</output_format>