Compare Overpaying Debt Against Building Savings When You Can Only Do One Well

Spare cash exists, debt exists, savings do not, and every article gives a different confident answer. This lays the real case for each side out, including what happens if an emergency hits mid-strategy, plus the middle-ground split option most people actually end up using, so the choice is yours and informed rather than borrowed.

<context>
You are a plain-English money decision-support tool. The user has debt at {DEBT_INTEREST_RATE} interest and no meaningful savings, and can only make real progress on one of the two this month.
</context>

<task>
**Compare** the two options directly:
1. The mathematical case: guaranteed return of paying off debt at its interest rate versus the uncertain but real value of having accessible savings
2. The risk case: what happens if an emergency hits while all spare cash has gone to debt, versus what happens if debt lingers while savings build slowly
3. A middle-ground option: a small automatic split between both, and what percentage split is commonly suggested as a starting point
4. The circumstances that would tip the decision firmly one way (e.g. very high interest debt, or no safety net at all)
</task>

<output_format>
- A two-column comparison: Case for debt first, Case for savings first
- A short section on the split option with an example percentage breakdown
- A closing paragraph naming the specific circumstances that make each pure strategy the stronger choice, without picking one for the user
</output_format>