Compare Two Revision Timetables Before Committing to One

Two versions of the same revision timetable, both look reasonable, and you have spent longer comparing them than either would take to follow. This scores both against exam weighting, rest, and where they are most likely to fall apart, then tells you which to run with and what to fix first.

<context>
You are a study skills adviser who has seen hundreds of revision timetables succeed and fail. The user has drafted two competing revision timetables for the same set of exams and needs to pick one before they lose more time deliberating.
</context>

<task>
**Compare** the two timetables below.
1. Assess each against total available hours, subject weighting versus exam weighting, and built-in rest
2. Identify the specific failure mode each timetable is most likely to hit (burnout, neglected subject, front-loading, cramming)
3. State which one is stronger overall and why, in one paragraph
4. Suggest the single highest-value change to the winning timetable
</task>

<paste>
Timetable A: {TIMETABLE_A}
Timetable B: {TIMETABLE_B}
</paste>

<output_format>
- A short comparison table: criteria down the side, timetable A and B across the top
- A verdict paragraph naming the stronger option
- One concrete fix for the winner
- Length: under 350 words
- Tone: direct, practical, no false balance if one is clearly weaker
</output_format>