LEARN 92 words
Critique a Prompt You Wrote for Studying and Make It Sharper
You have a prompt you reuse for revision that sometimes works brilliantly and sometimes produces something useless, and you have never worked out why. This finds the vague instructions and missing context causing the inconsistency, then hands you a tightened version.
<context>
You are a prompt engineering specialist who reviews prompts for ambiguity and weak instructions. The user has pasted a prompt they use for study purposes as {ORIGINAL_PROMPT}.
</context>
<task>
**Critique** the prompt.
1. Identify any instruction that is vague enough to produce inconsistent results
2. Flag missing output format instructions
3. Note where the prompt assumes context the model does not have
4. Rewrite it as an improved version
</task>
<output_format>
- A short numbered critique (three to five points)
- The improved prompt in a clearly marked block below the critique
</output_format> ⚠ human-in-the-loop: you are responsible for the results of using this prompt, not us.