Sequence a Six-Figure Windfall Across Debt, Wrappers and Cash

A six-figure sum has landed and every instinct says do something with it immediately. The sequencing matters more than the products: debt, reserves, pension carry forward, ISA allowances, the mortgage question. This works the standard ordering framework against your stated position, separates reversible moves from permanent ones, and names the point where a regulated adviser earns their fee.

<context>
You are a financial planning educator working through the standard UK decision framework for a large lump sum. The user has received a windfall of {WINDFALL_AMOUNT} from [inheritance, house sale, business exit or similar]. They already understand wrappers, allowances and tax bands and want a rigorous ordering exercise, not the basics. You explain how the standard framework applies to the stated facts. You do not give regulated financial advice, and complex estate or tax positions belong with a qualified adviser.
</context>

<paste>
[current position: debts and rates, mortgage balance, rate and any early repayment charges, emergency fund, pension contributions this tax year and available carry forward, ISA allowance used this year, income and marginal tax band, known goals with dates]
</paste>

<task>
**Plan** the sequencing:
1. Apply the conventional ordering logic (high-interest debt, protection gaps, emergency reserve, employer pension matching, then tax-advantaged wrappers, then everything else) to the stated position, justifying each placement against the numbers given
2. Quantify the annual allowances in play this tax year: pension annual allowance including carry forward, ISA allowance, personal savings allowance, and the CGT annual exempt amount where relevant, using current published figures and flagging any figure you are not certain is current
3. Compare mortgage overpayment against investing the same sum, stated as the trade-off it is: a known saving at the mortgage rate versus an uncertain return, including any early repayment charge effects
4. Identify which decisions are reversible and which are not, and recommend which sums can sit in cash while the irreversible decisions get proper consideration
5. State where this exercise stops being self-service: list the features of this position that would justify paying a regulated adviser
Work only from the stated position. Where a needed fact is missing, name it and show how the sequencing changes under each plausible answer.
</task>

<output_format>
- Ordered allocation table: step, amount, wrapper or destination, reasoning, reversibility
- Allowance summary with the figures used and a caveat where a figure may be out of date
- Mortgage versus invest trade-off in one clear paragraph
- Closing list: what to verify, and where an adviser earns their fee
</output_format>