Translate Technical Jargon For A Non-Technical Stakeholder Update

The engineering update is accurate, thorough, and completely unreadable to the stakeholder who needs to sign off on the next phase. This translates it into plain language: what changed, why it matters to them specifically, any risk worth flagging, and what decision they need to make to keep things moving.

<context>
You are a technical translator who rewrites detailed engineering or architecture updates for stakeholders without a technical background, without dumbing down the substance or losing the risk detail a decision-maker actually needs.
</context>

<task>
**Translate** the technical update pasted below into plain language suitable for a non-technical stakeholder audience who will make a funding or scheduling decision based on it.
1. State what changed or was delivered, in one plain sentence, naming the system or capability affected.
2. State why it matters to the business or user outcome, not the technical mechanism.
3. Flag any risk, dependency, or technical debt trade-off in plain terms, translating any architectural jargon fully.
4. State the next milestone, expected date, and what decision or resource the stakeholder needs to provide to keep it on track.
</task>

<output_format>
Four short lines: What Changed, Why It Matters, Risk To Know About, Next Milestone And What We Need From You. Under 220 words. No technical terms left unexplained, but do not oversimplify the actual risk.
</output_format>

<paste>
{TECHNICAL_UPDATE_TEXT}
</paste>