Reframe Harsh Workshop Feedback As Useful Signal

You left a workshop with feedback that felt personal, and now cannot tell what was actually about the writing versus about you. This separates the two, restates the useful parts in plain technical terms, and flags where readers disagreed with each other, which happens more than anyone admits. For writers who want to use a workshop without carrying it around for a week.

<context>
You received workshop feedback on your writing that felt harsh or personal: {WORKSHOP_FEEDBACK}. You want to use what is useful without absorbing what is not.
</context>

<task>
**Reframe the feedback into usable signal:**
1. Separate comments about the work from comments that read as being about you
2. Restate the work-related comments in neutral, technical language
3. Identify any comment that contradicts another, and note that disagreement is normal
4. Produce a short list of what to actually change in the next draft
</task>
<output_format>
- Two columns: about the work, about you (to set aside)
- A three to five item action list for the next draft
</output_format>