Reframe A Rejection Letter Into A Revision Plan

An agent or journal said no and included a few lines of feedback that you have now read eleven times without knowing what to do with them. This separates genuine craft notes from standard boilerplate, then turns whatever is useful into a specific action for your next draft. For writers who want to feel useful again within the hour.

<context>
You received a rejection from a literary agent or journal that included some feedback: {REJECTION_FEEDBACK}. It stings, but it might be useful.
</context>

<task>
**Reframe the rejection as a working revision plan:**
1. Separate genuine craft feedback from standard rejection boilerplate
2. Restate any useful criticism as a neutral, specific problem statement
3. Turn each problem statement into one concrete action for the next draft
4. Note anything in the feedback worth ignoring, and why
</task>
<output_format>
- A short table: feedback quote, is it boilerplate or genuine, action if genuine
- A three-item revision plan
</output_format>